A well-established criminal defence practitioner with an excellent reputation for her thorough preparation, client care and persuasive advocacy in all areas of criminal defence work, principally:
- Murder, Manslaughter and Serious Violence
- Serious Sexual Offences
- Drugs Offences, Organised Crime and Firearms
- Fraud and Financial Crime
R v H and others  Harrow CC: Instructed in false imprisonment case.
R v B  Southwark CC: Represented defendant charged with offences of perverting the course of justice that related to seeking to implicate an individual in the Westminster Terrorist attacks.
R v G  Nottingham CC domestic abuse case
R v O  Nottingham CC: Represented mother in case concerning allegations of child assault and neglect.
R v B  Southwark CC: Offences of perverting the course of justice.
R v ** Lincoln CC: Represented defendant in child abduction case.
R v L  Nottingham CC: Represented defendant on a multiple count indictment concerning child abuse and neglect.
R v L and others  Nottingham CC: Conspiracy to rob in transit vans.
Drugs Offences, Organised Crime & Firearms
Frequently instructed in cases concerning organised crime, firearms, organised drugs offences, county lines prosecutions, and multi-handed drugs conspiracies. These increasingly involve trafficking, modern slavery and the use of the National Referral Mechanism. Cases include
R v N and others  Lewes CC: Mutli-handed county lines allegations.
R v K and others  Nottingham CC: Multi-handed case concerning cannabis cultivation.
R v P and others  Maidstone CC: Conspiracy to supply class B drugs concerning a large number of defendants.
R v N  Swansea CC: Supply of Class A drugs in a county lines case, this case involved modern slavery, operation of the NRM and a successful argument that exceptional circumstances avoided the imposition of a minimum term sentence.
R v M and others  Derby CC: Class A conspiracy to supply.
R v H and others  Derby CC: Instructed in multi-handed allegations of drug supply.
R v K  Leeds CC: Represented defendant concerning significant exchange and storing of Class A drugs.
R v T and others [2018 and 2019] Isleworth CC: Leading junior in trial and re-trial of offences concerning breaches of immigration law said to be conducted by an organised crime group facilitating travel of non-EU nationals into the United Kingdom through the Republic of Ireland.
R v D and others  Southwark CC: Successfully defended female defendant on charges of kidnap, blackmail and false imprisonment against a background of drug dealing. Case concerned the imprisonment of a male for a number of hours in the home of the represented defendant. Acquitted on all counts.
R v C and others  multi-handed conspiracy to supply synthetic cannaboids
R v S  Derby CC: Instructed to defend allegations of fraud concerning facilitating illegal immigration for profit.
R v L  Northampton CC: Case concerning supply of drugs between drug users which resulted in a death.
R v B  Nottingham CC: Plea to firearm offences where defendant suffered significant mental health problems where a suspended sentence was imposed.
R v C  Harrow CC: Firearms offence for a young defendant resulting in imposition of a suspended sentence.
R v D and others  Northampton CC: This multi-handed trial concerned allegations of kidnap, possession of a firearm and perverting the course of justice said to arise from local turf war over drug dealing in Northampton. Defence succeeded on submissions in relation to hearsay applications to adduce evidence from a witness not before the court.
R v J  ILCC: Trial concerning possession of firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life linked to drug dealing.
Marie is also highly experienced in Murder, Manslaughter, Serious Violence and Serious Sexual Offences cases – of which more can be seen in the dedicated Homicide and Sexual Offences Sections.
Frequently instructed in high-profile murder, manslaughter and attempted murder cases, Marie is specialist criminal defence practitioner who has developed a particular expertise in dealing with ‘difficult’ and vulnerable clients particularly young defendants and those with mental health problems.
She regularly appears in the most serious cases of violent crime (murder, manslaughter, wounding with intent) often involving psychiatric defences and mental health disposals.
R v H and another  Exeter CC: Allegation of attempted murder and wounding with intent involving two complainants.
R v S  CCC instructed to represent female defendant on allegation of child murder.
R v H  Derby CC Led by Queen’s counsel in allegation of murder in context of local dispute. The defendant was alleged to have driven his car deliberately at the deceased. Issues of pathology, collison expertise and defence of accident arose. Acquitted of murder, manslaughter and causing death by dangerous driving.
R v C  Nottingham CC Led by Queen’s counsel in allegation of child murder.
R v M  Nottingham CC Led by Queen’s Counsel in multi-handed murder allegation said to be a revenge killing against a back ground of organised and extensive drug dealing.
R v Y  Central Criminal Court – The defendant was alleged to be part of a joint enterprise stabbing; acquitted of murder and manslaughter.
R v M  Inner London Crown Court: Allegation of causing GBH by throwing of corrosive substance.
R v T  Nottingham CC Instructed to defend 17-year-old defendant accused of murdering his friend.
R v T  Nottingham CC Represented defendant charged with the murder of his brother; acquitted of murder and manslaughter on the basis of self-defence.
R v F  Woolwich Crown Court: This case concerned a multi-handed prison mutiny at HMP Whitemoor where the disturbance was caught on CCTV in which all defendants had significant previous convictions for serious offences of violence.
R v M  Snaresbrook CC: Section 18 wounding with intent featuring an attack on a housemate with a knife and screwdriver.
R v H and others  Leicester CC: Represented defendant charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice linked to attempted murders
R v Lewis  Leicester CC One punch manslaughter case representing with Queen’s Counsel a Millwall fan charged with assaulting a Nottingham Forest fan. At trial the Crown offered no evidence on the manslaughter after expert evidence on causation forced a review.
R v Ahmed  Central Criminal Court Led by Queen’s Counsel in murder trial featuring group attack at a party in East London with a significant number of eye-witnesses.
R v B  Isleworth CC: Allegations of s18 wounding with intent with significant issues relating to Crown’s application to adduce multiple sources of hearsay evidence.
R v Thurston  Chelmsford CC High-profile case of gross negligence manslaughter concerning the death of a seven-year-old child on a bouncy castle. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-44494748
R v Zakaria Bulhan  Central Criminal Court Heavily publicised incident concerning attacks on members of the public in Russell Square attacks August 2016 leading to the death of an American tourist and the stabbing of five further people. The attacks were originally thought to be terrorist in nature although in due course it became clear the defendant was suffering from a severe mental illness. The defendant was in Broadmoor in the lead-up to the trial. Prosecution ultimately accepted pleas to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and s18 wounding. There were significant medical and legal arguments concerning whether the appropriate sentence should be a hospital order pursuant to section 37/41 MHA 1983 or life imprisonment. Ultimately a hospital order with an indefinite restriction was imposed.
R v R  Croydon CC: Represented defendant charged with his brother in relation to offences of s18 wounding with intent.
R v Lee  Guildford CC: Led by Queen’s Counsel in murder trial concerning death of a night porter in a hotel where self-defence was raised.
R v L  Central Criminal Court: Represented the defendant charged with attempted murder involving use of a firearm.
R v E  Blackfriars CC: This defendant was charged with attempted murder by strangulation said to have occurred during a robbery after consensual sex.
R v D  Kingston CC: Represented female defendant at trial for attempting to murder concerning multiple stab wounds inflicted on her partner. Acquitted of attempted murder.
R v B and another  Central Criminal Court: Allegation of joint enterprise murder concerning a stabbing. Led by Queen’s Counsel. Successful half-time submission for 17 year old defendant.
R v Farah and others  Central Criminal Court: Leading junior in relation to a disturbance during which the Crown a murder took place. Acquitted of violent disorder.
R v L and others  Snaresbrook CC: Led by Queen’s Counsel in case concerning allegation of attempted murder in a takeaway shop put on a joint enterprise basis.
R v Thomas and another  Central Criminal Court: Junior Counsel representing first defendant in joint enterprise murder where Crown’s alleged that deceased who was shot with a firearm was a victim of mistaken identity.
R v O and others  Central Criminal Court: Led junior instructed in a high-profile multi- handed murder trial concerning the large group attack which led to the death of a young man at Victoria station in front of passengers at rush-hour.
Marie has significant experience in conducting proceedings concerning sexual offences across the spectrum of serious sexual offences to include historic and multi-handed cases. Her case preparation is second to none and she is often selected to deal with cases on her ability to effectively engage with clients.
Increasingly instructed in cases involving serious sexual allegations against young and very young defendants; details of which are kept confidential given reporting restrictions. These cases regularly involve vulnerable witnesses, use of s28 pre-recorded cross-examination and use of intermediaries. Marie is trained to deliver Vulnerable Witness Training and has done so on a number of occasions including for Gray’s Inn.
R v A  Nottingham CC – instructed to represent defendant in a case concerning historic allegations.
R v H  Derby CC – instructed in case concerning sexual offences with online elements.
R v S  Norwich CC: Instructed to represent defendant on allegations of historic rape and sexual abuse.
R v H  Nottingham CC – allegations relating to familial sexual abuse.
R v R  Bradford CC – represented ex-Bradford City footballer sentenced for sexual offences.
R v B  Nottingham CC: sexual offences concerning vigilante paedophile group posing as underage children.
R v D  Basildon CC: instructed in case concerning young witness, s28 case.
R v S  Derby CC: historic allegations involving four young witnesses.
R v K  Isleworth CC: Represented elderly defendant on multi-count indictment concerning offences said to have taken place in the 1970s. It was a feature of the trial that these allegations came to light following publicity concerning later convictions for sexual offences.
R v W  Derby CC: Trial concerned allegations of rape and indecent assault made by a niece against her uncle which took place approximately twenty years ago.
R v M  Hove CC: Represented defendant in rape trial where the attack was caught on CCTV.
R v R  Snaresbrook CC: Represented Uber driver accused of sexual assault on passenger in presence of another.
R v V & others  Nottingham CC: Defended in multi-handed trial which featured allegations of people trafficking for sexual exploitation and controlling prostitution.
R v D  Southwark CC: Defended Uber driver accused of raping his passenger.
R v B  Harrow CC: Trial concerning historic inter-familial allegations which led to the severe psychiatric illness of one of the complainants.
R v J  Bristol CC: Instructed in multi-handed case alleged to involve grooming of one complainant where defendant had significant previous convictions for sexual offending.
R v H  WGCC: Trial concerned allegations of male rape; acquitted.
R v R  Harrow CC: Rape allegations featuring evidence that was recorded on the victim’s mobile telephone.
R v L  Nottingham CC: Representing convicted sex-offender resulting in a reduction of charges from rape to sexual activity with a child.
R v C  St Albans CC: Represented elderly defendant charged with offences against a 6 year old boy.
R v H  Lewes CC: Acquitted of multiple allegations of rape. This defendant was convicted of an offence of coercive/controlling behaviour within a relationship.
R v H  Northampton CC: This case concerned a defendant with prior convictions for rape charged with similar offences on his young grandchildren.
R v R  Burnley CC: Multi-handed historic abuse case featuring multiple count indictment alleged to reflect Asian group grooming. Acquitted following successful half-time submissions.
Instructed to advise and review numerous ‘old’ cases concerning conviction and sentence.
Involved in a number of complex and lengthy fraud cases with attendant confiscation proceedings. This area of Marie’s practice has concerned a number of forms of fraudulent activity including MTIC and Trading Standards (largely on-line) offences.
R v K  Nottingham CC: Trading Standards investigation.
R v S  Leeds CC: Instructed in Trading Standards e-commerce investigation concerning websites.
R v W  Lincoln CC: Represented defendant in relation to a number of counts of fraud committed against England Golf.
R v A  Bournemouth CC: Represented defendant who obtained significant funds from an elderly couple and other elderly victims by holding himself out to be a senior police officer.
R v D and another  Isleworth CC: Trial concerned fraud by false representation arising from the Grenfell Tower tragedy where a couple were said to have purported to reside in the home of a victim of the fire.
R v Smith [2019-20] Leeds Crown Court: Led junior in highly-publicised ‘ticket tout’ fraud trial.
R v Locke  Southwark CC: Defended in six-week two-handed trial concerning allegations of pension liberation fraud. The Daily Mail.
R v T  Central Criminal Court: Allegations of fraud and trademark offences committed over the internet
Instructed to advise on various prison law matters including parole, categorisation and licence conditions including advising on Judicial Review proceedings and representation at prison adjudications as well as parole hearings.
- The Criminal Bar Association Member
- Women in Criminal Law Member
- Appointed member of the Council of the Inns of Court Tribunal Appointments Body in 2018
- Visiting Lecturer University of Law
- Committee member of the Youth Practitioner’s Association (YPA)
- Gray’s Inn – advocacy trainer
- Vulnerable witness training facilitator
- Pupil supervisor
- Trustee of Transform Justice