Experienced as both a Junior and Leader in his three principle practice areas:
- Fraud and Financial Crime
- Regulatory and Professional Discipline;
- Confiscation, Civil recovery and Asset Forfeiture;
- Organised Crime.
Matt specializes in complex fraud, including corporate funding frauds, Off-shore Placement Schemes, Mutual Funds, Ponzi Investment Vehicles and MTIC “Carousel” frauds. He is particularly knowledgeable about such matters because, before coming to the Bar, he worked in Investment Banking for Kleinwort Benson.
In recent years instructions have been received to defend in respect of a number of high- profile cases prosecuted by the NTS e-Commerce Team concerning internet-based sales vehicles for the provision of Government-related services (e.g. Self-Assessment Tax, DVLA and National Insurance) and Secondary Ticket sales for entertainment events (e.g. Viagogo, Stubhub, Getmein etc.).
He is currently involved defending in numerous indictments prosecuted by the full breadth of financial investigating authorities: the SFO, FCA, HMRC, SOCPA, City Police and National Fraud Squad.
R v Hunter, Leeds CC: Leading Defence Counsel in the first prosecution of its kind to establish whether the Secondary Ticketing market in the UK was unlawful in respect of the sale of tickets for live sporting and entertainment events. The case involved the evidence of Ed Sheeran’s manager and promoter. The case involved criminal and civil arguments based on Regulators’ Code (Adaway consumer abuse), the law concerning tickets and contractual webs involved in the ticketing industry and unfairness to consumers in business-to- consumer contracts forming part of contractual webs.
R v Shah, Southwark CC: Counsel for the “Ringleader” individuals of an MTIC organization utilizing over thirty companies said to be involved in trading in alcohol. The gang stole £34 million in VAT and laundered £87 million through more than 50 bank accounts after in Britain, Cyprus, Hong Kong, Dubai and other foreign countries. Shah’s subordinates created paperwork for him detailing fictitious transactions, which were used as a cover for the sale of smuggled alcohol.
R v Crane, Hull CC: Leading Counsel for one of the main two Defendants in a multi-handed mortgage fraud in which multiple properties were bough then re-mortgaged in unlawful “back to back” sales.
R v Brooks, Central Criminal Court: Leading Counsel for the First Defendant in a multi-handed investment fraud concerning the sale of Carbon Credits and Rare Earth Metals to members of the public, with losers parting with upwards of £6m. A jury failed to agree on a verdict following a three-month trial at the Old Bailey. At the scheduled re-trial the Crown offered pleas to the minor offence of engaging in a misleading commercial practice and the case was settled without the need for another trial.
R v H, Teeside CC: Counsel for one of the three main Defendants in a government “copy- cat” website case whereby the Defendants are said to have misled individuals who intended to use Government services or submit their tax returns into the payment of service fees to their company. Over £19 million was received in fee income.
R v Hall, Teeside CC: Acquitted in an enormous and politically sensitive prosecution affecting the homes of hundreds of people in the North East. More than 1,000 mortgages were obtained by companies said to be controlled by the defendants in what is alleged to be one of the UK’s largest ever mortgage cases.
R v Disley, Preston CC: Leading Counsel for the principal defendant (who acquired the epithet of “The King of Marbella”) in an eight-handed cut-throat fraud trial.
R v Altinbas, CCC: Leading Counsel instructed by a solicitor defendant in respect of a multi- million pound immigration fraud in which the firm itself provided “brides for hire”.
R v Vidgeon, Ipswich CC: Leading Counsel for the principal defendant in a six-handed Boiler Room fraud in a joint SFO/FSA investigation. In a twist to the “usual” operation of such a fraud, on this occasion, the organization corrupted the executive management of the traded companies and secured their complicity to the perpetration of the fraud. The offending is alleged to be some of the most prolific, complex and significant of its kind, with over £7m being lost.
R v Fraser, Blackfriars CC: First Junior for one of the two defendants in the SFO prosecution emanating from the collapse of the Imperial Consolidated Group, one of the largest and most complex international investment frauds ever prosecuted by the SFO. The allegation was that the group of multi-national plc. companies were being run as a veil for a Ponzi fraud based upon Caribbean Private Placement and Mutual investment funds. Over 3,000 individuals invested over £253m. The first 6-month trial (2008) resulted in a hung jury and the second trial (2009-2010) led to complete acquittals after a trial lasting 160 days.
Following on from his background in the “City” through which he gained behind-the-scenes exposure to asset transfer vehicles, Matt has a wealth of experience in Restraint – whether it is Criminal (pre or post trial), Confiscation or Civil Asset Recovery.
Matt has been instructed in the whole gamut of Organized Crime offences up and down the country and has particular expertise in respect of RIPA and the use of covert monitoring devices and “undercover assets” – he was instructed in the first such cases where “probe evidence” was relied upon and has built upon that experience ever since.
R v Sharp, Kingston CC: Instructed as sole Counsel for a “key player” in a conspiracy to supply Class A drugs, which led to multiple seizures, one alone of which was 80 kilos of cocaine at 96% purity. The Defendant was acquitted.
R v Cullen, Liverpoool CC: Instructed as sole Counsel for the Ringleader of an Organised Crime Group which distributed Class A and Class B drugs throughout the North West and North Wales, as well as maintaining and Armory of weapons which were either used by themselves or hired out for profit to others.
R v Voos, Liverpool CC: Conspiracy to supply Class A and Class B drugs in the North West.
R v Allen, Basildon CC: Conspiracy to commit Violent Disorder and Pervert the Course of Justice. Counsel for the first of 13 Defendants concerning a large public disturbance after a football match as a result of which a man was left in a Persistent Vegetative State.
R v Isoufarj, CCC: Counsel for the first Defendant in a multi-handed conspiracy to import in excess of 50 kilos of Class A drugs.
R v C, Stafford CC: Murder – the drugs-related killing of rival dealer.
R v Rashid, Sheffield CC: Conspiring to supply Class A drugs and Perverting the Course of Justice (by the planting of a firearm and drugs at the home of a rival dealer in order to reduce the Drugs sentence that was pending), while on remand for a earlier Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs.
R v Patel, Preston CC: Violent Disorder stemming from a feud between two rival drugs gangs in Preston and Blackburn.
with his meticulous preparation, and his tactical awareness is second to none. He is a pleasure to work with, extremely responsive, and pro-active in his representation. An excellent, jury friendly barrister that I have no hesitation in recommending."—Craig Liversidge, Partner in the Specialist Crime Division, Forbes Solicitors.
but also his ability to interpret and present this data and his analysis to provide compelling support for the arguments he was advancing on my behalf. I was particularly reassured by his friendly nature and pragmatic approach. Throughout the entire time, he demonstrated ongoing care and diligence in all of his dealings with me and I would have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending him as a trusted, professional barrister to anyone who may require his services"—Acquitted client
- Criminal Bar Association
- Fraud Lawyers Association
- Proceeds of Crime Lawyers Association